If you could get on the mainstream media (all channels at once) what would you use the opportunity to say?
Before we talk current news, we have to get our history straight for the American public:
-John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA, organized by Allen Dulles and paid for by Nelson Rockefeller because JFK was eliminating the CIA and about to begin printing money without the FED.
-9-11 was a false flag operation that killed 2,000 people and was initiated by the Rockefellers and the CIA who used the public fear to manipulate the stock market to their benefit, while securing the nation thru the Patriot Act, enabling the military industrial complex unprecedented money and power.
-People who are blowing the whistle on governments, military and big businesses like Bradley Manning, Rudolf Elmer, Adam Winfield and Julian Assange are in jail because those people in power (that haven't been caught yet) don't like the public finding out how they have abused their power.
WikiLeaks publishes the whistle blowers...pure and simple. When the mainstream media is controlled by money, the money will always win until the will of the people is sparked and inspired toward finding out the truth about what's really going on.
Whistle blowers are people "in the know" who have witnessed corruption or human rights violations and don't want any part of it (let alone being an accomplice to hiding it) so they report it to journalists who will out those violations. Until the mainstream media cannot be bribed, the truth won't be found on regular TV news.
If we want our leaders to be held accountable for their actions, let's have "Amnesty for Transparency." ANYONE who wants to be free of unethical and immoral culture within government, military or business, may come forward and testify about what they witnessed (or enabled) and be freed for their honesty. The power of the People is dependent upon the honor of their leaders. Let's keep them clean.
Come forward and tell us what's wrong, and you will be received as a hero.
Showing posts with label "Transparency is the Apocalypse". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "Transparency is the Apocalypse". Show all posts
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Saturday, March 12, 2011
The People's Power
With all the conspiracy theory out there about what the "powers that be" are up to, I think it's important to remember the People's Power.
We are individual beings of living light. Science has been proving that little by little, and many religions have come to that conclusion as well.
That's pretty radical.
As beings of light, we are energy (or even angels) and have the power to use prayer/meditation/positivity/affirmation to change our reality. Right now, the world is waking up, and regardless of religious or scientific belief, we KNOW how powerful we are when we THINK together.
While we live our out normal lives, let's also affirm or pray these kinds of concepts to further the creative perception of our planet:
1. We, human beings, are united on our Earth.
2. We are harmonizing the Love of ourselves and each other to find harmony in our actions with each other.
3. We are affecting our physical world with positive change.
4. We are finding WIN-WIN solutions for all humanity to live in peace and enable each other's "Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness."
5. Our personal differences are embraced by our singular purpose of respect and empathy for one another.
Will you guys add some to this thread, and I'll make a HUGE list of beautiful ideas for the World to read? Then we can translate them into all of our languages, and send them to the rest of our planet.
We are individual beings of living light. Science has been proving that little by little, and many religions have come to that conclusion as well.
That's pretty radical.
As beings of light, we are energy (or even angels) and have the power to use prayer/meditation/positivity/affirmation to change our reality. Right now, the world is waking up, and regardless of religious or scientific belief, we KNOW how powerful we are when we THINK together.
While we live our out normal lives, let's also affirm or pray these kinds of concepts to further the creative perception of our planet:
1. We, human beings, are united on our Earth.
2. We are harmonizing the Love of ourselves and each other to find harmony in our actions with each other.
3. We are affecting our physical world with positive change.
4. We are finding WIN-WIN solutions for all humanity to live in peace and enable each other's "Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness."
5. Our personal differences are embraced by our singular purpose of respect and empathy for one another.
Will you guys add some to this thread, and I'll make a HUGE list of beautiful ideas for the World to read? Then we can translate them into all of our languages, and send them to the rest of our planet.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Who wouldn't want Transparecy?
The Status Quo are those who are satisfied with how our system is working.
This social group benefits from a lack of transparency, because they are privy to information before it hits the public. For example, members of the Bilderberg group meet every year, to make secret, coordinated business decisions together, so they can manipulate the stock market based on buying or selling stocks as a TEAM. When they, the wealthiest 1% of the populace, who own 90% of the Earth make strategic moves TOGETHER, say to sell stocks all at once, those not in the know (the other 99% of us) are at a disadvantage when we watch the stock market drop as a result of their teamwork. Likewise, once the rest of the market has mimicked them, and the value drops further, a group like this can then buy back their shares at a significantly lower price, making money on moves that ONLY THEY KNEW ABOUT.
"Short selling" stocks is another way of making money, IF YOU KNOW WHEN YOUR STOCK IS GOING TO SPLIT. If the stock splits during the course of your short, you'll owe twice the number of shares at half the price. The last time the Stock Market saw an unusually large percentage of "short sells" was the week before 9-11...is that a coincidence? No, if you know why: those who engaged in short selling the week before the World Trade Towers fell had insider information about what was going to happen. A simple way to find out who had prior knowledge, would be to ask our government for a list of those who made short sells during the week of September 4, thru September 10, 2001.
Unfortunately, that list is unavailable...it has been censored by our government from the public ever since the attacks of 9-11.
Why?
Because it would be a map to finding out who knew about 9-11 before it even happened. Lack of transparency allows money to be made in ways unavailable to the rest of the people, and that's not fair...or it is fair, until we decide as a people, that we want transparency within our governments and our big businesses.
To understand how it operates further, let’s understand the culture. If you are a part of this secretive group, you are not only benefiting from it, you are in on it, and therefore an accomplice before the act, meaning: "you can't snitch, because you've been getting rich with the rest of us…and if you tell, you’ll go down with the rest of us as well.”
The difficulty for the lay people of Earth is obtaining transparency from a group of elitists who don't want to get caught, and are accruing wealth thru unethical and often immoral means.
How do we stop this culture?
We ask, “who is willing to come forward and be the whistle blower of all whistle blowers?”
Someone in The Status Quo will answer.
Who’s first?
This social group benefits from a lack of transparency, because they are privy to information before it hits the public. For example, members of the Bilderberg group meet every year, to make secret, coordinated business decisions together, so they can manipulate the stock market based on buying or selling stocks as a TEAM. When they, the wealthiest 1% of the populace, who own 90% of the Earth make strategic moves TOGETHER, say to sell stocks all at once, those not in the know (the other 99% of us) are at a disadvantage when we watch the stock market drop as a result of their teamwork. Likewise, once the rest of the market has mimicked them, and the value drops further, a group like this can then buy back their shares at a significantly lower price, making money on moves that ONLY THEY KNEW ABOUT.
"Short selling" stocks is another way of making money, IF YOU KNOW WHEN YOUR STOCK IS GOING TO SPLIT. If the stock splits during the course of your short, you'll owe twice the number of shares at half the price. The last time the Stock Market saw an unusually large percentage of "short sells" was the week before 9-11...is that a coincidence? No, if you know why: those who engaged in short selling the week before the World Trade Towers fell had insider information about what was going to happen. A simple way to find out who had prior knowledge, would be to ask our government for a list of those who made short sells during the week of September 4, thru September 10, 2001.
Unfortunately, that list is unavailable...it has been censored by our government from the public ever since the attacks of 9-11.
Why?
Because it would be a map to finding out who knew about 9-11 before it even happened. Lack of transparency allows money to be made in ways unavailable to the rest of the people, and that's not fair...or it is fair, until we decide as a people, that we want transparency within our governments and our big businesses.
To understand how it operates further, let’s understand the culture. If you are a part of this secretive group, you are not only benefiting from it, you are in on it, and therefore an accomplice before the act, meaning: "you can't snitch, because you've been getting rich with the rest of us…and if you tell, you’ll go down with the rest of us as well.”
The difficulty for the lay people of Earth is obtaining transparency from a group of elitists who don't want to get caught, and are accruing wealth thru unethical and often immoral means.
How do we stop this culture?
We ask, “who is willing to come forward and be the whistle blower of all whistle blowers?”
Someone in The Status Quo will answer.
Who’s first?
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
The Math on our World
Broken down in simple math:
+1 = a person who thinks up positive ideas, creates positive ways of living and makes positive change. Most importantly a '+' means 'add' to the world.
-1 = a person who thinks up negative ideas, destroys positive ways of living and makes negative change. Most importantly a '-' means 'take away'.
0 = a person who thinks nothing, creates nothing and makes no change. Most importantly, a '0' means 'nothing'.
If those three people were trying to live together, the problem would look like this:
+1
-1
0
______
0 (in other words, nothing's able to happen and there can be no change based on the way the first two people cancel each out by disagreeing, and the third is insignificant...at least at this point in their life)
Now you do the math:
Where are we today?
How easy is it to be a '0'?
How difficult is it to be a '+1'?
Can people who are '-1' change?
If this was your world, what answer would YOU want?
+1 = a person who thinks up positive ideas, creates positive ways of living and makes positive change. Most importantly a '+' means 'add' to the world.
-1 = a person who thinks up negative ideas, destroys positive ways of living and makes negative change. Most importantly a '-' means 'take away'.
0 = a person who thinks nothing, creates nothing and makes no change. Most importantly, a '0' means 'nothing'.
If those three people were trying to live together, the problem would look like this:
+1
-1
0
______
0 (in other words, nothing's able to happen and there can be no change based on the way the first two people cancel each out by disagreeing, and the third is insignificant...at least at this point in their life)
Now you do the math:
Where are we today?
How easy is it to be a '0'?
How difficult is it to be a '+1'?
Can people who are '-1' change?
If this was your world, what answer would YOU want?
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Censorship of WikiLeaks at USMessageboard.com
I started with the latest piece I wrote (see last thread): "Why I support WikiLeaks"
I put it under "Politics"
It was up for five minutes, then I got a response saying, "you did not follow forum rules" and something to do with not being able to post on that category. So I moved it to "Opinions" and it was up for a few more minutes. I got a bunch of replies, and it was taken down again.
Then I tried going with "WiciLeeks"...same deal...then "Wiccileecz" and "Joolien Uhsonje". The posts were up a little longer, but then they were taken down, same message.
Then I posted under a guy who managed to put up a post called "WikiLeaks" but the whole article was basically bashing Obama, so in the reply column, I posted the my piece. There it stayed for about an hour, and I hit up the author and asked him, "how did you get your words to stay there?" That's when I noticed there were zero replies next his thread which had been there several days (all the other threads in the same catagory had replies in the double and triple digits)...in that hour, me and a couple other people put up replies, then it was completely yanked, and I got the "banned" message.
Oh well, another blog on censorship I guess. The Europeans will say 'told you so'...the Americans will keep watching Sports Center.
I put it under "Politics"
It was up for five minutes, then I got a response saying, "you did not follow forum rules" and something to do with not being able to post on that category. So I moved it to "Opinions" and it was up for a few more minutes. I got a bunch of replies, and it was taken down again.
Then I tried going with "WiciLeeks"...same deal...then "Wiccileecz" and "Joolien Uhsonje". The posts were up a little longer, but then they were taken down, same message.
Then I posted under a guy who managed to put up a post called "WikiLeaks" but the whole article was basically bashing Obama, so in the reply column, I posted the my piece. There it stayed for about an hour, and I hit up the author and asked him, "how did you get your words to stay there?" That's when I noticed there were zero replies next his thread which had been there several days (all the other threads in the same catagory had replies in the double and triple digits)...in that hour, me and a couple other people put up replies, then it was completely yanked, and I got the "banned" message.
Oh well, another blog on censorship I guess. The Europeans will say 'told you so'...the Americans will keep watching Sports Center.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Latest collective theory on worldwide Animal deaths
[In three parts]
1. Wik-Bee Leaks Uncovers Government Bee Killing Conspiracy
http://animals.change.org/blog/view/wikileaks_uncovers_government_bee_killing_conspiracy
The November 2nd memo, leaked to a Colorado beekeeper, indicates that the EPA was well-aware that the pesticide Clothianidin posed some serious risks to honey bees. There have been concerns about this chemical from as far back as 2003, and it's already been banned in Germany, France, Italy and Slovenia because of its toxicity. But the EPA chose to sweep all that under the rug to keep the pesticide on the market.
Clothianidin, marketed as "Poncho" by Bayer, is widely used on corn, as well as canola, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers and wheat. As if the $262 million cash crop from last year wasn't enough, Bayer wants to keep expanding the pesticide's use. And the company's original registration was based on some seriously flawed science: they evaluated the wrong crop, with the wrong controls to assess the impact on bees.
This all adds up to some serious questions about the government contributing to Colony Collapse Disorder as they knowingly allowed Bayer to poison bees. And this is about a lot more than honey production ... native habitats, and as much as one-third of America's food supply, rely on the pollination provided by bees.
In light of the leaked memo, the National Honey Bee Advisory Board, American Beekeeping Federation, American Honey Producers Association, Beyond Pesticides, Pesticide Action Network North America, and Center for Biological Diversity sent a letter to the EPA requesting that the agency "take urgent action to stop the use of this toxic chemical."
The letter goes on to point out that this new information indicates an overuse of the Office of Pesticide Program's conditional registration program. This bee boondoggle "represents a failure that could and should have been avoided." As a result, the coalition is calling for an immediate moratorium on these types of registration until the program is evaluated.
There's still a lot we don't know about Colony Collapse Disorder and the massive bee die-offs it's been causing. One thing we do know is that bees are in trouble, and that's not good news for all the animals (and humans) who rely on the plants these important insects sustain.
Join the call for the EPA to stop the sale of Poncho and conduct a thorough study into the pesticide's impact on wildlife.
2. Bye Bye Blackbird: USDA Admits Responsibility for Mass Bird Death; 4,000,000 Birds Killed in ’09
http://morallowground.com/2011/01/20/bye-bye-blackbird-usda-admits-responsibility-for-mass-bird-death-4000000-birds-killed-in-09/
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) had admitted responsibility for the poisoning of thousands of birds, many of which were found dead on the ground and frozen in trees in Yankton, South Dakota on Monday. According to Truthout, the USDA’s Wildlife Services Program works with farmers to cull birds which often eat large quantities of agricultural feed and defecate on livestock and farm equipment. There’s even a name for this little-known government bird control program: Bye Bye Blackbird. In 2009 alone, the USDA killed more than 4,000,000 red-winged blackbirds, starlings, cowbirds and grackles. Pesticides are the weapon of choice; an avian poison called DRC-1339 was used in the Yankton case. Up to 5,000 birds were sprayed in neighboring Nebraska and somehow managed to make it to South Dakota before dying. The USDA stresses that this incident is in no way related to the mass bird deaths that have made headlines this year, most notably in Arkansas and Louisiana.
Under the Bye Bye Blackbird program, farmers are allowed to kill any blackbirds, grackles and starlings deemed to be a health risk or damaging to the economy. Farmers often hire private contractors to do the dirty work. “Every winter, there’s massive and purposeful kills of these blackbirds,” Greg Butcher, director of bird conservation at the National Audubon Society told Truthout. Carol Bannerman, a spokeswoman for USDA Wildlife Services, dismisses the obvious animal cruelty implications of such killings. “It’s not that we have anything against starlings, but our charge is to help protect agriculture… and protect property and human health or safety,” she said. “And the fact is, in a lot of rural settings, people say, ‘It’s just birds, what’s the problem?’”
It’s “just birds”… including some endangered ones. Ornithologists believe the mass killings may be reducing the number of the rare rusty blackbird, which roosts with more common varieties of blackbirds. With private contract killers not required to keep tabs of how many birds they kill, the rusty blackbird could be in serious danger.
3. Dead Birds, Bees & Fish Explained By EPA Document? VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CeR8tV1iss
This video is the Young Turks breaking down the simple logic of, "Hello?" If you kill the honey bees with poison (albeit unintentionally), then you admit to feeding the birds poison (after the US government stated on record, that they did not poison the birds) you don't think there could be exponential effects on the rest of our ecosystem?
Any poison infected bird that dies and falls into streams, rivers and oceans will be eaten by fish (sound familiar?) and any birds that fall on land around carnivores can be possibly eaten as well. Also, poisonous bird droppings will land all over crops, grains, and food for us and other animals.
It obviously wasn't well thought out, but GOD DAMN. Einstein said, "If the bees die, the human race will be dead within four years," (no pollinators, no plants) and now we're finding out the only other pollinators are dying as well. It doesn't sound very bright. It sounds like greed and opportunism, similar to what we've been experiencing with many big business decisions as of late.
Thanks to all my fellow WikiLeakers for collecting these links and sharing them freely.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...literally...now what shall we do about it?
1. Wik-Bee Leaks Uncovers Government Bee Killing Conspiracy
http://animals.change.org/blog/view/wikileaks_uncovers_government_bee_killing_conspiracy
The November 2nd memo, leaked to a Colorado beekeeper, indicates that the EPA was well-aware that the pesticide Clothianidin posed some serious risks to honey bees. There have been concerns about this chemical from as far back as 2003, and it's already been banned in Germany, France, Italy and Slovenia because of its toxicity. But the EPA chose to sweep all that under the rug to keep the pesticide on the market.
Clothianidin, marketed as "Poncho" by Bayer, is widely used on corn, as well as canola, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers and wheat. As if the $262 million cash crop from last year wasn't enough, Bayer wants to keep expanding the pesticide's use. And the company's original registration was based on some seriously flawed science: they evaluated the wrong crop, with the wrong controls to assess the impact on bees.
This all adds up to some serious questions about the government contributing to Colony Collapse Disorder as they knowingly allowed Bayer to poison bees. And this is about a lot more than honey production ... native habitats, and as much as one-third of America's food supply, rely on the pollination provided by bees.
In light of the leaked memo, the National Honey Bee Advisory Board, American Beekeeping Federation, American Honey Producers Association, Beyond Pesticides, Pesticide Action Network North America, and Center for Biological Diversity sent a letter to the EPA requesting that the agency "take urgent action to stop the use of this toxic chemical."
The letter goes on to point out that this new information indicates an overuse of the Office of Pesticide Program's conditional registration program. This bee boondoggle "represents a failure that could and should have been avoided." As a result, the coalition is calling for an immediate moratorium on these types of registration until the program is evaluated.
There's still a lot we don't know about Colony Collapse Disorder and the massive bee die-offs it's been causing. One thing we do know is that bees are in trouble, and that's not good news for all the animals (and humans) who rely on the plants these important insects sustain.
Join the call for the EPA to stop the sale of Poncho and conduct a thorough study into the pesticide's impact on wildlife.
2. Bye Bye Blackbird: USDA Admits Responsibility for Mass Bird Death; 4,000,000 Birds Killed in ’09
http://morallowground.com/2011/01/20/bye-bye-blackbird-usda-admits-responsibility-for-mass-bird-death-4000000-birds-killed-in-09/
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) had admitted responsibility for the poisoning of thousands of birds, many of which were found dead on the ground and frozen in trees in Yankton, South Dakota on Monday. According to Truthout, the USDA’s Wildlife Services Program works with farmers to cull birds which often eat large quantities of agricultural feed and defecate on livestock and farm equipment. There’s even a name for this little-known government bird control program: Bye Bye Blackbird. In 2009 alone, the USDA killed more than 4,000,000 red-winged blackbirds, starlings, cowbirds and grackles. Pesticides are the weapon of choice; an avian poison called DRC-1339 was used in the Yankton case. Up to 5,000 birds were sprayed in neighboring Nebraska and somehow managed to make it to South Dakota before dying. The USDA stresses that this incident is in no way related to the mass bird deaths that have made headlines this year, most notably in Arkansas and Louisiana.
Under the Bye Bye Blackbird program, farmers are allowed to kill any blackbirds, grackles and starlings deemed to be a health risk or damaging to the economy. Farmers often hire private contractors to do the dirty work. “Every winter, there’s massive and purposeful kills of these blackbirds,” Greg Butcher, director of bird conservation at the National Audubon Society told Truthout. Carol Bannerman, a spokeswoman for USDA Wildlife Services, dismisses the obvious animal cruelty implications of such killings. “It’s not that we have anything against starlings, but our charge is to help protect agriculture… and protect property and human health or safety,” she said. “And the fact is, in a lot of rural settings, people say, ‘It’s just birds, what’s the problem?’”
It’s “just birds”… including some endangered ones. Ornithologists believe the mass killings may be reducing the number of the rare rusty blackbird, which roosts with more common varieties of blackbirds. With private contract killers not required to keep tabs of how many birds they kill, the rusty blackbird could be in serious danger.
3. Dead Birds, Bees & Fish Explained By EPA Document? VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CeR8tV1iss
This video is the Young Turks breaking down the simple logic of, "Hello?" If you kill the honey bees with poison (albeit unintentionally), then you admit to feeding the birds poison (after the US government stated on record, that they did not poison the birds) you don't think there could be exponential effects on the rest of our ecosystem?
Any poison infected bird that dies and falls into streams, rivers and oceans will be eaten by fish (sound familiar?) and any birds that fall on land around carnivores can be possibly eaten as well. Also, poisonous bird droppings will land all over crops, grains, and food for us and other animals.
It obviously wasn't well thought out, but GOD DAMN. Einstein said, "If the bees die, the human race will be dead within four years," (no pollinators, no plants) and now we're finding out the only other pollinators are dying as well. It doesn't sound very bright. It sounds like greed and opportunism, similar to what we've been experiencing with many big business decisions as of late.
Thanks to all my fellow WikiLeakers for collecting these links and sharing them freely.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...literally...now what shall we do about it?
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Nosce te ipsum "Know thyself" (To all WikiLeakers)
I respect Jesus because his Love of everyone (even his captors and even his slanderers), and his trust in God manifested in healing and leading.
I respect Muhammad for his teachings of unity and family that lead to brotherly love and unification.
I respect Moses for giving us the ten commandments, a perfect moral compass for humanity.
I respect Buddha for his patience and kindness and understanding of what it is to be human.
I respect Bahá'u'lláh for putting all of the best parts of world religions into one belief system.
I respect Mary Baker Eddy for manifesting a scientific approach to healing thru Christianity.
I respect Gandhi for his peaceful application of dissention and his nonviolent method for protesting fascism.
I respect Martin Luther King for his bravery, his trust in his fellow man and his faith in the American judicial system.
I respect Ayn Rand for giving us a reason to Love and cherish capitalism thru fictional heroes based on her greatest sense of good.
I respect Paulo Coelho for using stories to inspire mankind to dream our greatest dreams and turn them into reality.
I respect Orson Scott Card for his understanding of strategy and how to help the Earth achieve a WIN-WIN solution for everyone.
I respect Julian Assange for his courage to live his belief in transparency even with the threat of death hanging over his every action.
I respect Obama for having the audacity to believe he could become President of the United States and I'm grateful that he is enabling us to be better using ANY or ALL of the above mentioned philosophies.
I, Jonathan Getzschman, am a WikiLeaker, because I believe that Amnesty for Transparency is the fastest way to get the truth about US. I don't mind if you disagree with me, but this is what I know about myself, and that's important.
Please tell me what you know about yourself, and make it good...
(and go to the WikiLeaks Discussion boards to brainstorm with us)
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
"The Pentagon Papers" Supreme Court ruling applies to WikiLeaks
I'm reading "Obama's War" by Bob Woodward ©2010, and on page 179 he says:
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
We, The People, are Alright
The people are alright. We are not the corrupt governments who represent us. We are not the messages of fear pervaded by the media. We are not the military who kills in our name. We are the people, and we are fine.
We, the American people are also fine with the Russian people. They haven't hurt us. Our governments have attempted to make us think we should be scared of each other, but we're not. The American people will not hurt the Russian people, and the Russian people will not hurt us American people.
We, the American people are also fine with the British people. The British people have been close to us for a long time because much of us came for the British people. We will not hurt the British people and the British people will not hurt us American people
We American people are also fine with the Afghani people, because the Afghani people are good just like us. The Afghani people are not the terrorists who kill in their name. We will not hurt the Afghani people and the Afghani people will not hurt us.
This is true of all the peoples on our planet. We American people are made up of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Agnostics, Energy and Love. That's also why we are so full of good, because we are made up of the rest of the world. Humans beings are one life force working together and the American people are the proof.
Let's not let any government or media or military convince us otherwise. Any attempt to make us afraid or doubt our togetherness is irresponsible and intended to control us.
We are smarter than that. We create our governments, they don't create us. We know in our hearts that we are one and not divided. Let anyone know who would tell you otherwise, We, the people of Earth are alright.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...and it's starting...now.
We, the American people are also fine with the Russian people. They haven't hurt us. Our governments have attempted to make us think we should be scared of each other, but we're not. The American people will not hurt the Russian people, and the Russian people will not hurt us American people.
We, the American people are also fine with the British people. The British people have been close to us for a long time because much of us came for the British people. We will not hurt the British people and the British people will not hurt us American people
We American people are also fine with the Afghani people, because the Afghani people are good just like us. The Afghani people are not the terrorists who kill in their name. We will not hurt the Afghani people and the Afghani people will not hurt us.
This is true of all the peoples on our planet. We American people are made up of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, Agnostics, Energy and Love. That's also why we are so full of good, because we are made up of the rest of the world. Humans beings are one life force working together and the American people are the proof.
Let's not let any government or media or military convince us otherwise. Any attempt to make us afraid or doubt our togetherness is irresponsible and intended to control us.
We are smarter than that. We create our governments, they don't create us. We know in our hearts that we are one and not divided. Let anyone know who would tell you otherwise, We, the people of Earth are alright.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...and it's starting...now.
Friday, January 7, 2011
Amnesty for Transparency...out of the question?
A belief is only a thought I keep thinking...so if I'm not getting what I want, and I keep thinking about what I don't have, I'm going to continue proving that I will never get what I want.
Well, if a belief is only a thought I keep thinking (I'm not worthy...no pain no gain...it must be karma...I was born under the wrong star...it's the government's fault...) what happens if I start thinking about ONLY what I want, even if it's not true yet?
The Wright Brothers thought man could fly...EVERYONE said they couldn't. SCIENCE said they couldn't...HISTORY said they couldn't...but what happened?
They made their belief reality by thinking a thought over and over.
I want Amnesty for Transparency because we become stronger as metaphysical beings when we learn to trust ourselves (and then each other) so we can move beyond the cultures of primal man. It's time.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...it's coming whether they want it or not.
Well, if a belief is only a thought I keep thinking (I'm not worthy...no pain no gain...it must be karma...I was born under the wrong star...it's the government's fault...) what happens if I start thinking about ONLY what I want, even if it's not true yet?
The Wright Brothers thought man could fly...EVERYONE said they couldn't. SCIENCE said they couldn't...HISTORY said they couldn't...but what happened?
They made their belief reality by thinking a thought over and over.
I want Amnesty for Transparency because we become stronger as metaphysical beings when we learn to trust ourselves (and then each other) so we can move beyond the cultures of primal man. It's time.
Transparency is the Apocalypse...it's coming whether they want it or not.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
How about Amnesty for Transparency?
As long as government officials and the military want to come clean, they won't do jail time. Nelson Mandella orchestrated that for his new South African government after apartheid was lifted and they got the truth out about government assassinations, corruption and unethical methods. Killers and monsters walked, but it tied everything together and the victims were able to mourn (many with their abusers), and it was very healing.
It would work great with our politicians, because those who come clean walk, and those who don't talk begin to look REALLY guilty as testimony piles up around them.
If we're all transparent, we can't conquer each other any more. We can only progress as lifeforms. Part of the reason some Aborigines from Australia are mentally telepathic with each other is because in their words, "once you let down your guard and allow others to look into you, the fear of embarrassment or judgment falls away and you are free to think out loud".
Our government cannot progress to a higher level of consciousness (let alone accountability) until we get the past out of the way.
As Earthlings, when we stand together on ANYTHING, things improve fast. Why don't we just demand it? Amnesty for Transparency.
It would work great with our politicians, because those who come clean walk, and those who don't talk begin to look REALLY guilty as testimony piles up around them.
If we're all transparent, we can't conquer each other any more. We can only progress as lifeforms. Part of the reason some Aborigines from Australia are mentally telepathic with each other is because in their words, "once you let down your guard and allow others to look into you, the fear of embarrassment or judgment falls away and you are free to think out loud".
Our government cannot progress to a higher level of consciousness (let alone accountability) until we get the past out of the way.
As Earthlings, when we stand together on ANYTHING, things improve fast. Why don't we just demand it? Amnesty for Transparency.
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Something big and bad is about to happen...it's in the wind.
BBC NEWS
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
