Monday, February 25, 2013

Questioning Integrity (BANKS)



“Just listen to me. You have the problem, and you’re trying to put the blame on me? What are you getting off at?”
“No, no…”
“Yes, you are. You’re trying to put the blame on me and question MY INTEGRITY?”
“No!”
“Yes, you are young man! You’re questioning my integrity? You’re the one that better take a look at the integrity!”
“I just wanted to get it cleared up, because I don’t wanna go out here thinking bad things about you like this.”
“Well I’m thinking bad things about you right now!”
"Ok..."

So…the deficit is my fault?
Oh…that credit was in my vault?
No. Your negligence is trifold:
try the Fed, BOA and Diebold.

Banks, get paid to collect it,
tanks, get made to protect it,
thanks…is still expected,
even if you get less of what you invested.

TARP, a funny way putting it:
The Art of Receiving Profit they shouldn’t get.
If we were smart, we’d stop and put it in
something that makes money and not further debt.

Instead, they act crazy and laugh harder,
getting away with financial manslaughter.
If it stays this way, or goes any farther,
we may have to flush the baby with the bathwater.

“You have the problem, and you’re trying to put the blame on me and question MY INTEGRITY?”

Yes, that exactly what I’m saying,
the system’s a mess and you’ve been playing,
confess your crime, and begin laying
tracks for some currency worth maintaining.

Greenbacks, last time I checked
these stacks held value, not less.
Old Abe saved us, and not them,
then John Wilkes Booth was sent to stop him,

and he did. The banks were so glib.
There’s no use crying over spilt milk,
but he never got to spend that quid. Be-
fore he could admit he got paid, he got kilt.

The USA prospered from those days,
until the banks went back to their old ways.
The Fed Act was passed to make crime pay.
The last president to act was JFK…

“I just wanted to get it cleared up, because I don’t wanna go out here thinking bad things about you like this.”
“Well I’m thinking bad things about you right now!”

DANGER! Those guys hold a lot of anger,
old school paranoia like cliff hangers.
Is it the coke, or the thought of strangers
slicing our pie with a lot of fingers?

The problem is, that’s legal.
You’re supposed to respect that eagle,
but when Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall,
you went from kinda greedy to flat out evil.

When your sole job, is to hold cash,
how long does it take ‘til you can’t hold
back, from taking all that, and wanting more,
‘til your soul turns black and you start world

wars, and it’s still not enough, and you push and
shove, and you only get sex, and you never get
love, and you make twin towers blow up,
all for just a few more bucks? That’s fucked up…

“I don’t have to sit here and explain this to you. Get out of here!”
“Ok…he’s fucking pissed dude! He just yelled the shit outta me! No, I know I gotta go back to my room, cause he is just pissed!”

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Chapter Thirty-Four


“We even got a mosquito drone for snatching DNA samples,” Brennan continued.

“Enough with the drones John,” said the President. “Don’t get me wrong, I’m impressed, and I’m grateful we’re not killing as many of our soldiers as we have in conventional warfare, but I’d like to tackle another subject…for my sake.”

“What subject?” asked Brennan.

“Christopher Dorner.”

Brennan looked perplexed. “Is the president no longer interested in ‘plausible deniability’?”

“Quite sure,” responded the president. “You see, I’ve been black for a very long time, and this whole story looked pretty contrived, like it was straight out of a James Elroy novel.”

Brennan eyeballed the president, paused, took a deep breath and began. “Dorner was not just LAPD. He was planted there by the Office of Naval Intelligence after another policeman blew the whistle on them back in 1999. His mission was to investigate who was fucking up, and it turned out they all were.”

“Go on,” ordered the president.

“Since Poppy Bush let the LAPD work with CIA running drugs back in the 80’s, it seems as if they’ve never been able to shake their taste for ‘diplomatic immunity’. They got used to being above the law, and they’ve been maintaining that status. Dorner was picked to infiltrate them and keep tabs on anything major going down. The only problem happened last time he was deployed overseas a year ago.”

“What was that?” asked the president.

“He was KIA in a Navy seal operation in the Mediterranean.”

The president kept his eyes on Brennan. “So this entire Dorner story revolved around a dead man who hasn’t even been on US soil for a year? What about the video surveillance? What about his manifesto?”

Brennan’s nostril’s flared. “Psy-ops sir. All members of OSI, CIA, FBI, etc. have a contract clause that states they and/or their names may used at any time for any reason if it’s a benefit to the welfare of this country. In Dorner’s case, we had multiple reasons to use his profile.”

“Such as?”

Brennan continued. “Such as protecting other agents assigned to shake down the LAPD. Such as scaring certain members of the LAPD into submission. Such as using a ‘rogue cop’ theme to divide Americans into two groups: those who see him as a threat (and in turn will see guns as a threat) and those who would choose to support a ‘terrorist’ (and in turn will be flagged).”

The president closed his eyes. “So you’re saying, it’s acceptable to tarnish a good soldier’s name who passed away protecting his country all for the sake of fooling Americans into giving up their freedom of speech and gun rights?”

Brennan looked cold. “If that’s how you choose to oversimplify it, yes sir.”

“And the public is buying it?”

“On the whole, yes,” continued Brennan. “Of course you’ve got the occasional conspiracy theory nut who actually noticed that Dorner’s ‘wallet’ was found on three separate occasions in three different locations, but you know, those people are ‘crazy’ and can be defamed if necessary.”

“Was it complete military theater, or were those cops and that couple actually killed?”

“Oh, they were killed sir,” replied Brennan, “but not by Dorner. Without telling you more than you need to know, just consider it ‘house cleaning’. It has to happen every once in awhile, and the LAPD was begging for it. Likewise,” he paused for dramatic effect, “if you’re planning on passing any further gun regulations, you’re definitely going to need more precedents to pull the public along to your side. Would you rather have innocents killed randomly or would it be worth all of our time to induce some form of…quantitative easing?”

The president hid his thoughts. “Thanks for your explanation John. That helps me understand what needs to be done.”

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Is Chris Dorner's Story Really That Shocking?



Media pundits and sociologists across the county are "shocked" that any of the American public would support Chris Dorner. Why? His experience in the LAPD shows a systematic history of impunity (exemption from punishment or loss or escape from fines) in regards to human rights violations. Within international law, diplomatic immunity was originally a form of protection for government workers. Movies like "Lethal Weapon II" or "Enemy of the State" give examples of how some diplomats abuse it. Movies like "Training Day" or "Bad Lieutenant" show how some cops ignore the law and often conspire together more like gangsters than public servants.



Who did you root for in those movies?



The corrupt officials? The amoral CIA operatives? The blackmailing police? (all of whom kill with no conscience)

-or-

The characters who recognized the difference between right and wrong? (who also kill, but only when it's clear their targets are systematically injuring mankind with no regard for the consequences)



Those are just movies, but what happens when similar circumstances occur in real life? Do we expect people to keep attempting legal means of accountability when they don't work? Is it fair that some in power take advantage of their positions to wrong citizens?

How long does this go on before someone like Chris Dorner happens?

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Chris Dorner, Naval Intelligence Officer



According to the NAVY, Dorner was bascially moonlighting at the LAPD (2005-2008). They list his missions here for the NAVY during that time period:



Navy BIOGRAPHICAL DATA (while working at LAPD, 2005-2008)

San Diego, CA 23Apr2007-29May2007
Coastal Riverine Group Two Det Bahrain 3Nov2006-23Apr2007
Coastal Riverine Group One, San Diego, CA 10Jul2006-31Oct2006
NMPS San Diego, CA 6Jul2006-10Jul2006
Mobile Inshore Undersea Warfare Unit 23Jun2004-28Feb2006

http://www.10news.com/news/investigations/us-navy-releases-records-of-triple-shooting-suspect-christopher-dorner02072013



Out of curiosity, how does a sailor work as a cop in Los Angeles while in Bahrain for half a year?

Was he naval intelligence? According to this link, the answer is yes, Dorner became a Naval Intelligence officer on August 4th, 2006.

http://projects.scpr.org/static/timelines/christopher-dorner-timeline/



The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) is NAVY's version of the CIA...Lee Harvey Oswald was in the ONI...but he was more famous for being the patsy for JFK's assassination.

http://www.oni.navy.mil/



Is this a coincidence?

Friday, February 8, 2013

The Curious Case of Chris Dorner



A Los Angeles Police Department cop and former military man, Chris Dorner was fired after blowing the whistle on questionable activity by his fellow officers over a period of four years. This week, it is alleged that he shot three people and took off on the run while documenting it in a long-winded "manifesto" explaining his actions, his history and his beliefs. The LAPD has already shot up three cars and injured several civilians during the start of a frantic man hunt. Mainstream media has not picked up the story yet...the internet is buzzing.

In regards to Dorner, I'm still waiting to find out:

1. Is this guy really psycho? (doubt it)
2. Is he a whistle blower on the run being framed for LAPD corruption? (most likely)
3. Is this just military-style Psy-Ops "theater" waged to control public opinion about gun control? (possibly, the CIA can be quite opportunist)
4. Is it all of the above? (from what we've learned about US history, patsies come in all shapes and sizes - Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan - but they usually aren't completely innocent).

To be specific: I don't know for sure what's transpired. Was his manifest edited? Probably. The media took out the juicy names, what else did they censor/invent? Did he actually kill anyone? I hope not. How many movies have we seen where the boyscout gets framed for his superiors' unethical behavior? MANY.

What I do know: there is a significant percentage of power mongers that, when called out, they shift the blame and defame the accuser so the public thinks they are lying...it happens all the time. The US government and the military industrial complex use that tactic on the regular, and the Los Angeles Police Department is FAMOUS for being corrupt.




I hope we find out the truth...if it is as the media reports, so be it, but if this is theater...I'm veeeeeeery interested in finding out who authorized this.




["Full" Manifesto via NBC]

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The Problem with Reliable Gun Registration


CONSPIRACY THEORY #4080:
Gun registration numbers are difficult to trace, because the gun industry has clients like the CIA, the FBI and other government organizations that may need "cover" (aka diplomatic immunity) for murder they've committed. If local police could just log in to an NRA database and find out the owner of a murder weapon, it would be too confusing.