9-11-2011
Dear sirs,
We are shocked and awed at your audacity to murder our fellow human beings in a business decision to destroy the World Trade Towers, and accrue insurance money, stock market splits and an increase in funding via the Patriot Act. Your strategy of using fear to sway US public opinion through the symbolic destruction of American greatness is cowardly, monstrous and sad. You have betrayed the Constitution and proved you will justify treason to obtain your desired ends. Killing fellow citizens in an orchestrated method to secure more power is the immoral act of a traitor. You do not have the shared interests of the People, so We, the People no longer need your leadership, your products, or your laws. We do not wish to avenge our dead brothers and sisters with more bloodshed, because that would only continue to further violence. Instead, we seek a WIN-WIN solution for all mankind interested who wish to be harmonious and open to Love as our guide instead of fear.
US law is inspirational and unifying when used for fair, objective justice, but like any great computer program, an update is necessary every once in awhile. Currently, money dictates the law, and that is the definition of corruption. For those people in power who wish to further our American greatness, please update our system: blow the whistle on those in power who are abusing their positions, and let them face the consequences of their actions. 9-11 was the greatest, malicious hoax ever pulled on our civilization, but now that we know who they are and why they did it, their power is no longer valid to us. We, the People, are unified through our trust of each other and love of humanity. Only love can make heaven possible on Earth, so until you give up murder as an option for “rational” policy, you are no longer welcome here.
We appreciate your resignation immediately.
Peace,
The People
Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Friday, April 8, 2011
What Happened on 9-11?
9-11-------------------------------------------------------->
The US Air Force was playing "war games" the weeks before the attack...battle scenarios, drills, etc...one of those simulations actually being an attack on the World Trade Center. NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) was responsible for the safety of the airways, and normally, anytime a commercial airliner flies off course, two to four F-14 US fighters are scrambled within 20 minutes and "accompany" the jets to see what the emergency is. If it's a terror attack, they have instructions to shoot down the plane, so it can't be used as a "missile". On that day, NORAD claims they didn't send fighters after the four airliners because they thought it was a drill, and the F-14s were somewhere else...so for over TWO HOURS...while those "commercial airliners" were gearing up to attack the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. Who called NORAD off? That's the answer to who initiated 9-11
If you want to know who was in on it within the WTC, find the answer to these three questions: 1. Who was supposed to work in the WTC on 9-11 but didn't show up? 2. Who WASN'T supposed to work in the WTC on 9-11, but was ordered to go in anyway? and 3. Who made short-sells on the Stock Exchange the week before 9-11 (meaning: who knew the towers would fall which would make the market crash, and capitalized upon it by short selling their stocks, so when they split and doubled, the stock holders would have twice as many stocks)? These answers are still unknown to the public, because the names are the answers of who was in on it...President Obama could change that.
In military speak, it's called a "False Flag Operation" which means: make it look like the country has been attacked, attach a face to that attack (or a patsy), so the people will have an enemy, then use the people's fear to justify attacking that person and their country. In this case, Osama was ex-CIA who realized what the US government was up to, infiltrating all nations of the world with military and political influence to essentially steer those powers to US interests. Osama went rogue and began telling the Muslim world what the US was doing, and the US does not forgive that kind of truth telling. Our military took out the towers by way of the Rockefeller family and the CIA. Why? The Rockefeller family owns the banks and consequently the Stock Market, and the CIA runs much of the military industrial complex. RESULT: Stock Market crashed and most of the public lost their money, unless you had insider information and short sold your stock the week before, CIA and US Military got to invade Afghanistan and Iraq (???) to insure oil barons get a mainline, and the Patriot Act was born: more security for the US, less privacy to its citizens and the military industrial complex gets a bigger paycheck...until they want MORE.
P.S. It's not all of the Rockefellers and the CIA, just a handful at the top who organized it and set it up...the majority down the chain were just following orders. I think this time, we should find out the reality of who thinks they can rob the United States of money, lives, freedom and truth and put them on trial. If there are any whistle blowers up to the challenge...please step forward now.
The US Air Force was playing "war games" the weeks before the attack...battle scenarios, drills, etc...one of those simulations actually being an attack on the World Trade Center. NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) was responsible for the safety of the airways, and normally, anytime a commercial airliner flies off course, two to four F-14 US fighters are scrambled within 20 minutes and "accompany" the jets to see what the emergency is. If it's a terror attack, they have instructions to shoot down the plane, so it can't be used as a "missile". On that day, NORAD claims they didn't send fighters after the four airliners because they thought it was a drill, and the F-14s were somewhere else...so for over TWO HOURS...while those "commercial airliners" were gearing up to attack the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. Who called NORAD off? That's the answer to who initiated 9-11
If you want to know who was in on it within the WTC, find the answer to these three questions: 1. Who was supposed to work in the WTC on 9-11 but didn't show up? 2. Who WASN'T supposed to work in the WTC on 9-11, but was ordered to go in anyway? and 3. Who made short-sells on the Stock Exchange the week before 9-11 (meaning: who knew the towers would fall which would make the market crash, and capitalized upon it by short selling their stocks, so when they split and doubled, the stock holders would have twice as many stocks)? These answers are still unknown to the public, because the names are the answers of who was in on it...President Obama could change that.
In military speak, it's called a "False Flag Operation" which means: make it look like the country has been attacked, attach a face to that attack (or a patsy), so the people will have an enemy, then use the people's fear to justify attacking that person and their country. In this case, Osama was ex-CIA who realized what the US government was up to, infiltrating all nations of the world with military and political influence to essentially steer those powers to US interests. Osama went rogue and began telling the Muslim world what the US was doing, and the US does not forgive that kind of truth telling. Our military took out the towers by way of the Rockefeller family and the CIA. Why? The Rockefeller family owns the banks and consequently the Stock Market, and the CIA runs much of the military industrial complex. RESULT: Stock Market crashed and most of the public lost their money, unless you had insider information and short sold your stock the week before, CIA and US Military got to invade Afghanistan and Iraq (???) to insure oil barons get a mainline, and the Patriot Act was born: more security for the US, less privacy to its citizens and the military industrial complex gets a bigger paycheck...until they want MORE.
P.S. It's not all of the Rockefellers and the CIA, just a handful at the top who organized it and set it up...the majority down the chain were just following orders. I think this time, we should find out the reality of who thinks they can rob the United States of money, lives, freedom and truth and put them on trial. If there are any whistle blowers up to the challenge...please step forward now.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Open Letter to the US Government
Open Letter the US Government
February 3, 2011
People of the US Government,
It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.
We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.
We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.
Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.
Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers
February 3, 2011
People of the US Government,
It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.
We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.
We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.
Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.
Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
"The Pentagon Papers" Supreme Court ruling applies to WikiLeaks
I'm reading "Obama's War" by Bob Woodward ©2010, and on page 179 he says:
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Something big and bad is about to happen...it's in the wind.
BBC NEWS
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
