What if the People enacted new laws based on the abuser's name so history could remember why they were necessary?
The Bill O'Reilly Act: any corporation sponsoring "news" must be factual and held legally accountable (for libel, slander or defamation of character), otherwise they must use the term "entertainment".
The FOX NEWS Act: any media found to be peddling fear mongering while calling it "news" will be barred from TV.
The Karl Rove Act: all government officials may no longer be protected by the term "diplomatic immunity".
The Dick Cheney Act: torture is NEVER acceptable, and you WILL be held accountable.
The George W. Act: nepotism is no longer legal.
The Reagan Act: any president who "can't recall" illegal orders they gave while in office will be impeached.
The GOP Act: political parties are now illegal due to the wasting of tax payer time and money. WIN-WIN solutions for the entire country is to be the only agenda for anyone entering politics.
The Rockefeller Act: FDIC banks may no longer play with customer money or they will be forced to give all their personal wealth to charity.
The Stock Exchange Act: brokers must be transparent about ALL their dealings and knowledge of the market with customers and regulators.
The Jack Abramoff Act: Government officials may not be paid for influence. Once in politics, government salary can be the only source of income.
The US Military/Police Act: soldiers/policemen may no longer kill people.
The CIA Act: You are accountable for ALL of your actions to the citizens of the United States.
The FEMA act: you will use ALL your funding to HELP Americans in need.
The Citizens United Act REMIX: Corporations are NOT People, and ALL campaign finance must be transparent and accounted for.
The JFK Act: Any fact finding and evidence collecting for presidential assassinations will be handled by NO ONE IN THE GOVERNMENT.
The 9-11 Act: see instructions on the JFK Act and apply it to acts of war.
The BP Oil Spill Act: If you spill oil, your company will be divided up and auctioned off to the remaining responsible oil corporations.
The Monsanto Act: ALL GMO's must be declared in EVERY food group. The public has a right know what it's consuming.
The McDonald's Act: ALL ingredients, suppliers and pictures of the actual animals slaughtered must be listed on the product.
The J.E. Hoover Act: ALL actual history of US military complex activity in existence will be released to the public for posterity sake.
The DNA Act: any "criminal" found to be innocent thru DNA evidence, will be compensated for lost time and wages by their accusers.
The Big Pharma Act: Before you sell any medicine, you must inform the consumer that diet and exercise will do more than a pill.
The FDA Act: the five food groups will be replaced by this statement: organic, live food is good for you and anything with preservatives is not.
The Bad Cop Act: any officer convicted of abusing the law will be imprisoned for the sentence of whomever he victimized.
The Iran/Iraq Act: any country found to be manipulating facts about WMD's or the threat of smaller countries will have their military taken away.
The Abortion Act: any US citizen who doesn't think abortion is moral shall not have one.
The US Law Act: Money may no longer shape the law. All lawyers will work pro bono and mediation will be suggested.
The Fast Food Act: all fast food must have warning labels like tobacco products, "this is bad for your heath."
The Ball bearing industry/Marijuana Act: Anyone ever tampering with mankind's right to develop the most useful plant on God's green Earth will be tarred and feathered and displayed publicly.
Showing posts with label The US government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The US government. Show all posts
Monday, January 23, 2012
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Open Letter to the US Government
Open Letter the US Government
February 3, 2011
People of the US Government,
It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.
We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.
We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.
Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.
Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers
February 3, 2011
People of the US Government,
It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.
We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.
We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.
Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.
Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
"The Pentagon Papers" Supreme Court ruling applies to WikiLeaks
I'm reading "Obama's War" by Bob Woodward ©2010, and on page 179 he says:
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
