Saturday, March 28, 2015

The Skull and Bones vs. The Masons



The disinterest Americans have with their factual history is astounding. The latest research (and some just old and suppressed) has Hitler funded almost entirely by wealthy Americans: The Bushes funneled money to the Nazis from US supporters and the Rothschilds maintained their banking in Europe, Henry Ford gave them tanks and trucks for little return, Cocacola gave them pop for free, Dupont and BASF helped create the gas for killing the Jews. Likewise, the same uber rich who tried a coup to overthrow the US government with Smedley Butler in 1933 (who refused and outed them to FDR, who didn't reprimand them, because it was an election year) were making money off Hitler.



The 1% play both sides in war, and as war profiteers, every American should know who they are. To them, war is just the fastest route to bigger money. Peace (although more profitable in the long run) isn't as financially explosive. The average lives of Americans and the countries we fight don't matter to them.



Obama is the not only the first black president, he's also the first black mason president (the Bushes, Ford, Nixon and many in their Nazi background were all bonesman, while most of the other presidents were masons) and to me that's telling. Since the birth of the USA, the masons have controlled much of the power that was "stolen" from royalty (the background of the Skull and Bones). Ever since, old money has been slithering back into power in America. In my research, masons appear more honorable (although still secretive) as they build and show off their power thru intellect and ingenuity in architecture and technology. The Skull and Bones are existentialists who take power "at whatever the cost." They are true megalomaniacs who use (in Dick Cheney's words) utilitarianism or "the ends justifies the means" to justify ANYTHING. Instead of immoral, they consider themselves amoral or "having nothing to do with morality." To them, having morals is weakness that can be exploited.



Right now, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu keeps trying to fabricate Iran's military motives in the middle east to justify destroying them, but he's being pushed by war profiteers to make more money. The Rothchilds allowed millions of their own people to die in WWII for money, AND they got a slice in the middle east to create a Jewish state. Zionists are essentially Jewish existentialists who believe the same as the Bonesmen, and they play with words like "antisemitism" to point the finger at anyone who disagrees with the Israeli government, even though the Israeli government is not a true representation of the Israeli people (kind of like America).



The only solution to me is transparent government. To make that happen however, we have to make popular the idea of being open and honest instead of secretive and slimy. It will take someone who is respected (celebrity, politician, veteran, etc.) to announce this and prove it by their actions. My idea was to make this person into a traveling reality tv show, where they always have a camera on them. If politicians never had a moment alone, we would certainly see what their true policy is.





The real question is, how? How do we make our government interesting enough for Americans to want to play a part?

Thursday, March 19, 2015

James Files is Misquoted Again by the Media

In another twist of the media lying to the public about the words of James Files (the "grassy knoll gunman" and killer of JFK) this week's National Examiner just repeated what the Inquisitr and DailyMail did:


[photos by Ken Caron]

In the Newmax TV special on "I killed JFK" (aired 11/20/2014 on Directv channel 349 and Dish channel 223) James Files said
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the Dal-Tex building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."



Newsmax.com misquoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they left out Dal-Tex)

Inquisitr misquoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored Newsmax)
THEN
"According to Files, it was Nicoletti who was supposed to be in the book depository and not Oswald."
THEY LIED.

DailyMail misquoted him (11/21/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored Newsmax and the Inquisitr)
THEN
"He says the other shot that hit Pres. Kennedy came from his boss, Charles 'Chuckie' Nicoletti, who was hiding out in the book depository, the same place Lee Harvey Oswald is believed to have been at the time of the shooting.
THEY LIED TOO.



The National Examiner is the third media source in a row to misquote the testimony of James Files. He also claims CIA asset Eugene Brading (aka Jim Braden) let Charles Nicoletti and Johnny Roselli into the Dal-Tex building with the intention of securing a room on the 2nd floor to shoot JFK.



I would imagine the owners of the Dal-Tex building wouldn't want that information to go public...