Tuesday, January 13, 2015

What Modern Day "Conspiracy Theory" Means: We Don't Believe You


When people use the term "conspiracy theory" or "conspiracy theorist" as a means of discrediting others, it's a bit awkward. The person labeling is short-sighted, because in the long run of history, many conspiracy theories turn out to be true.

Early on, it was J.E.Hoover (head of the FBI) who declared "there is no mafia." He spoke in the name of the US government, and it turned out it was a lie. Regardless of whether his lie was a strategic feint to further ensnare more mafioso, it was still a lie. MK-ULTRA (CIA sponsored mind control experiments), The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (injecting African Americans with disease and monitoring them) and Operation Mockingbird (government controlled media) were all wildly outlandish propositions during their introduction into our society, and anyone attempting to acknowledge them would be laughed at (even called crazy), but nevertheless, they turned out to be true. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was reported by our government as an attack on a US ship by the North Vietnamese. At the time, anyone who doubted it would be considered a "conspiracy theorist" even though they would've been right (it was propaganda). During he Iran-Contra scandal, our government lied, and Ollie North went to jail. It's been proven the government has lied then and many other times. Why is that so difficult to conceive of presently?

Did the government just decide to stop lying now?

Here's part of the problem: when our government lies about what it tells the public, that divides the public into those who believe the lie and those who believe it's a conspiracy. That means, EVERY TIME the government lies they create conspiracy theorists. Why can't our government just be honest like the way we expect them (and pay them) to be?

President Nixon is actually given credit for coining the phrase "conspiracy theorist," because of all the US citizens calling him out on his lies. Is that irony or satire (or just an attempt to defame/discredit those who know the truth)?

Overall, "conspiracy theorists" often prove they were right. There was a conspiracy to lie/withhold/interfere/confuse the public.

Now, why would they do that? A better question may be, is that who you want running this country?

Saturday, January 3, 2015

Letter to the Editor of Newsmax.com - Concerning JFK, James Files and Charles Nicoletti

Letter to the editor:
one of your stories was misquoted...curiously so.



In the Newmax TV special on "I killed JFK" (aired 11/20/2014 on Directv channel 349 and Dish channel 223)
James Files said
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the Dal-Tex building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."

Newsmax.com quoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(you left out Dal-Tex)
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/john-kennedy-assassination-confession-mafia/2014/11/20/id/608736/

Inquisitr quoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored you)
THEN
"According to Files, it was Nicoletti who was supposed to be in the book depository and not Oswald."
THEY LIED.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1625226/mob-hitman-james-files-confesses-to-jfk-assassination-again-claims-he-was-man-on-grassy-knoll/

DailyMail quoted him (11/21/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored you too)
THEN
"He says the other shot that hit Pres. Kennedy came from his boss, Charles 'Chuckie' Nicoletti, who was hiding out in the book depository, the same place Lee Harvey Oswald is believed to have been at the time of the shooting.
THEY LIED TOO.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2843665/Mob-hitman-James-Files-claims-man-responsible-President-John-F-Kennedy-s-assassination-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-never-fired-single-shot.html



You withheld "Dal-Tex" in your reporting of his direct quote.
Inquisitr and DailyMail changed Dal-Tex to "the book depository."

My concern is: this isn't about the past or conspiracy theories, this is about a testimony on camera. Within that recorded testimony, you withheld "Dal-Tex" intentionally, even though it's ON CAMERA. Then these other publications intentionally misled readers into believing Nicoletti shot at Kennedy from the book depository, instead of the Dal-Tex building, even though it's ON CAMERA.

Why did you remove "Dal-Tex" (what he actually said) from the quote?
Why did they change Dal-Tex to the book depository?
Who ordered the withholding of Dal-Tex?
Who ordered the lie?



If you are to be considered a serious news source, it would behoove you to find out who is attempting to confuse the public. It's been happening with this case for sometime now.



thanks,
Jonathan



Excerpts from "Files on JFK" used by Newsmax TV in "I Killed JFK"
Copyright Wim Dankbaar of http://jfkmurdersolved.com/