These days and times mirror 1961 in many ways. The military is gearing up for more war and the people (and the president) don't want that. President Obama (like JFK) was NOT expected to be president (at least so soon in each case), and the powers that be are (were) making a lot of money off the modern-day system of bankrolling the military with a hefty percentage of taxpayer money. Kennedy saw how far the military wanted to take America into war and put a stop to it, firing top CIA officials who were clearly interested in war over the interests of the public. He also began dismantling the CIA because it's power had overgrown government control. In early Vietnam (1963) the CIA even disregarded many of President Kennedy's orders because they "disagreed with him." The more JFK tried to CHANGE the government, the more the government fought him, and eventually the military biased sides of the government turned on him, executing him in a sloppy Coup d'Etat pulled off by CIA, FBI and Dallas Authorities via physical intimidation, control of the media and murder. The heads of state at the time rationalized JFK as a threat not only to their own welfare but to the American way of life.
Let's not allow that to happen to Barack Obama.
IF President Obama solves this unfinished case, several things will work in his favor:
1. The public will be inspired by the truth. As opposed to the average, political fear mongering that dictates the public is not to be trusted and is to be treated according to herd mentality, when the public is given the truth, life gets exciting. Cool...what's going to happen next? It could be handled in an amnesty, like when South Africa was freed of Apartheid and an amnesty was given to those responsible for atrocities, so long as they told the truth about the corruption and the violence. It would be historic. Think of the vindication of all those who knew the truth when it happened, but were ridiculed or intimidated or killed for their knowledge.
2. Obama will be trusted by the public. Outing something this huge by a President? Holy cow! We've been taught our whole privileged/jaded lives NOT TO TRUST THE GOVERNMENT. Why? Because of assassinations from Lincoln to MLK to Bobby Kennedy and events like 9-11. Something inside Americans says "I'm not buying it." Power makes people do crazy things, but BIG POWER can make any strategy worth rationalizing. Fighting Communism became the mantra after WWII, but once the Cold War was over...(think military) how do we make money now? How do we rationalize getting the public to pay for our way of life? How do we keep our jobs during peacetime?
3. The public will protect President Obama. Whether having camera phones ready, keeping an ear out for conspiracy or praying for our leader, the public will love him more. This president is facing incredibly similar times, and we CANNOT ignore history or we will be faced with similar outcomes. If Obama acknowledges the JFK assassination as a Coup d'Etat of the PRIOR heads of government and warns us that this can be prevented again by TRANSPARENT governing, i.e. ALL GOVERNMENT SPENDING IS ACCOUNTED FOR AND CAN BE VIEWED BY THE PUBLIC, we will have actual checks and balances through public awareness.
4. Obama can then initiate policies of building the world through the military instead of destroying it. The military needs a reason to exist, but it doesn't have to for be potential threats of violence or for obtaining lucrative weapons contracts. Help is needed ALL over the world, more killing is not.
5. The public will feels it's POWER. The people control the government, not the other way around. The 1950s to 2008 presents this as the opposite. Why don't we make change via TRUTH?
Please give America the truth. WE CAN HANDLE IT, AND WE ALL WILL BENEFIT.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Okay, so we got a high ranking confession for JFK's death...how about some federal recognition?
[from Wikipedia.com]
Deathbed confession In 2007, Wiley published an autobiography of former CIA and Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt [61], who implicated Lyndon B. Johnson in the assassination. Hunt stated that Johnson orchestrated the killing with the help of CIA agents who had been angered by Kennedy's actions in the past,[62] which included an affair that Kennedy had with a wife of one of the agents. A 2007 article published in Rolling Stone magazine about the death of E. Howard Hunt reveals his deathbed confessions to his son which names Johnson, CIA agents Cord Meyer, Bill Harvey and David Sánchez Morales, as well as a "French" gunman named Lucien Sarti, who purportedly shot at Kennedy from the grassy knoll: E. Howard scribbled the initials "LBJ," standing for Kennedy's ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under "LBJ," connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that's never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer's name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer's name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales' name, with a line, the framed words "French Gunman Grassy Knoll." So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories.[63] It is unlikely that Cord Meyer would have sought revenge against Kennedy for the affair because Cord and his wife Mary had divorced in 1958, while Mary's and Kennedy's affair began in 1962.[64] The Rolling Stone article states that the case of her murder had never been solved, based on the fact that Ray Crump, the man accused of her murder, was found not guilty. Though Crump was found not guilty, he was found near the scene with blood on his hands, torn jeans, and an unzipped pants fly. The jacket found near the scene was identified by Crump's wife as belonging to him.[65] There is no record connecting either Harvey or Morales to the assassination. A gunman put two bullets into her two days before her 44th birthday. Her diary and letters related with her affair with JFK were kept by James Angleton, chief of the CIA’s counter-intelligence group, for safekeeping with the intention, according to him, to be returned to her children. This letter was never burned as Angleton initially stated.[66] Since 1974 it had been speculated that Hunt and CIA agent Frank Sturgis were among the "Three Tramps" who were photographed in Dealey Plaza, and held by the Dallas Police, shortly after the assassination.[67] This theory has fared badly, first as the result of the work of forensic anthropologists working for the House Select Committee on Assassinations who ruled out Hunt and Sturgis in an analysis of the photographic evidence,[68] and then as the result of the release of Dallas Municipal Archives documents that subsequently identify the tramps as Harold Doyle, John F. Gedney, and Gus W. Abrams.[69] Alternatively, other researchers propose to identify Hunt as a figure crossing Dealey Plaza in a raincoat and fedora immediately after the assassination.[70]
Thank God for that. I remember when everyone and their mom attacked Oliver Stone for putting out JFK in 1992, claiming that his theory was preposterous (even though it was based entirely on Jim Garrison's evidence). Guess we still had too many of those people in power.
President Obama? Some help here?
Deathbed confession In 2007, Wiley published an autobiography of former CIA and Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt [61], who implicated Lyndon B. Johnson in the assassination. Hunt stated that Johnson orchestrated the killing with the help of CIA agents who had been angered by Kennedy's actions in the past,[62] which included an affair that Kennedy had with a wife of one of the agents. A 2007 article published in Rolling Stone magazine about the death of E. Howard Hunt reveals his deathbed confessions to his son which names Johnson, CIA agents Cord Meyer, Bill Harvey and David Sánchez Morales, as well as a "French" gunman named Lucien Sarti, who purportedly shot at Kennedy from the grassy knoll: E. Howard scribbled the initials "LBJ," standing for Kennedy's ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under "LBJ," connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that's never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer's name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer's name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales' name, with a line, the framed words "French Gunman Grassy Knoll." So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories.[63] It is unlikely that Cord Meyer would have sought revenge against Kennedy for the affair because Cord and his wife Mary had divorced in 1958, while Mary's and Kennedy's affair began in 1962.[64] The Rolling Stone article states that the case of her murder had never been solved, based on the fact that Ray Crump, the man accused of her murder, was found not guilty. Though Crump was found not guilty, he was found near the scene with blood on his hands, torn jeans, and an unzipped pants fly. The jacket found near the scene was identified by Crump's wife as belonging to him.[65] There is no record connecting either Harvey or Morales to the assassination. A gunman put two bullets into her two days before her 44th birthday. Her diary and letters related with her affair with JFK were kept by James Angleton, chief of the CIA’s counter-intelligence group, for safekeeping with the intention, according to him, to be returned to her children. This letter was never burned as Angleton initially stated.[66] Since 1974 it had been speculated that Hunt and CIA agent Frank Sturgis were among the "Three Tramps" who were photographed in Dealey Plaza, and held by the Dallas Police, shortly after the assassination.[67] This theory has fared badly, first as the result of the work of forensic anthropologists working for the House Select Committee on Assassinations who ruled out Hunt and Sturgis in an analysis of the photographic evidence,[68] and then as the result of the release of Dallas Municipal Archives documents that subsequently identify the tramps as Harold Doyle, John F. Gedney, and Gus W. Abrams.[69] Alternatively, other researchers propose to identify Hunt as a figure crossing Dealey Plaza in a raincoat and fedora immediately after the assassination.[70]
Thank God for that. I remember when everyone and their mom attacked Oliver Stone for putting out JFK in 1992, claiming that his theory was preposterous (even though it was based entirely on Jim Garrison's evidence). Guess we still had too many of those people in power.
President Obama? Some help here?
Friday, February 20, 2009
President Barack Obama, will you open up JFK assassination files? PLEASE?
I'm still reeling from the Jim Garrison interviews about the Kennedy Assassination. HOLY COW! If Obama has any nuts, he'll reopen that case and find the truth...easy. After Kennedy botched the Bay of Pigs, he started breaking up the CIA, because he thought they were too powerful, and they wanted war as a business. The heads of the CIA that rolled still had the other agencies' support. Once Kennedy began pulling out of Vietnam, he was destroying a big paycheck for the military and many others. They figured out how to rationalize that in the name of "National Security" this particular president should be let go. He didn't hold the interests of those in power, and it was right to remove him, so long as it could be done swiftly and be believed by the public. It was a clean Coup d'Etat. The interviews of those bistanders who were there are wild. The files aren't supposed to be opened until 2029, but I bet Barack could look now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
