Who wouldn't want Transparecy?

The Status Quo are those who are satisfied with how our system is working.

This social group benefits from a lack of transparency, because they are privy to information before it hits the public. For example, members of the Bilderberg group meet every year, to make secret, coordinated business decisions together, so they can manipulate the stock market based on buying or selling stocks as a TEAM. When they, the wealthiest 1% of the populace, who own 90% of the Earth make strategic moves TOGETHER, say to sell stocks all at once, those not in the know (the other 99% of us) are at a disadvantage when we watch the stock market drop as a result of their teamwork. Likewise, once the rest of the market has mimicked them, and the value drops further, a group like this can then buy back their shares at a significantly lower price, making money on moves that ONLY THEY KNEW ABOUT.

"Short selling" stocks is another way of making money, IF YOU KNOW WHEN YOUR STOCK IS GOING TO SPLIT. If the stock splits during the course of your short, you'll owe twice the number of shares at half the price. The last time the Stock Market saw an unusually large percentage of "short sells" was the week before 9-11...is that a coincidence? No, if you know why: those who engaged in short selling the week before the World Trade Towers fell had insider information about what was going to happen. A simple way to find out who had prior knowledge, would be to ask our government for a list of those who made short sells during the week of September 4, thru September 10, 2001.

Unfortunately, that list is unavailable...it has been censored by our government from the public ever since the attacks of 9-11.

Why?

Because it would be a map to finding out who knew about 9-11 before it even happened. Lack of transparency allows money to be made in ways unavailable to the rest of the people, and that's not fair...or it is fair, until we decide as a people, that we want transparency within our governments and our big businesses.

To understand how it operates further, let’s understand the culture. If you are a part of this secretive group, you are not only benefiting from it, you are in on it, and therefore an accomplice before the act, meaning: "you can't snitch, because you've been getting rich with the rest of us…and if you tell, you’ll go down with the rest of us as well.”

The difficulty for the lay people of Earth is obtaining transparency from a group of elitists who don't want to get caught, and are accruing wealth thru unethical and often immoral means.

How do we stop this culture?
We ask, “who is willing to come forward and be the whistle blower of all whistle blowers?”
Someone in The Status Quo will answer.
Who’s first?

Open Letter to the US Government

Open Letter the US Government



February 3, 2011

People of the US Government,

It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.

We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.

We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.

Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.



Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers

The Math on our World

Broken down in simple math:




+1 = a person who thinks up positive ideas, creates positive ways of living and makes positive change. Most importantly a '+' means 'add' to the world.


-1 = a person who thinks up negative ideas, destroys positive ways of living and makes negative change. Most importantly a '-' means 'take away'.


0 = a person who thinks nothing, creates nothing and makes no change. Most importantly, a '0' means 'nothing'.




If those three people were trying to live together, the problem would look like this:

+1

-1

0

______

0 (in other words, nothing's able to happen and there can be no change based on the way the first two people cancel each out by disagreeing, and the third is insignificant...at least at this point in their life)




Now you do the math:


Where are we today?

How easy is it to be a '0'?

How difficult is it to be a '+1'?

Can people who are '-1' change?




If this was your world, what answer would YOU want?

Interview of the Year starring Julian Assange

produced, mixed and mastered by Jonathan Toth from Hoth at The Cooler in St. Louis, MO for TheFrozenFoodSection.com, January 31, 2011

Censorship of WikiLeaks at USMessageboard.com

I started with the latest piece I wrote (see last thread): "Why I support WikiLeaks"


I put it under "Politics"
It was up for five minutes, then I got a response saying, "you did not follow forum rules" and something to do with not being able to post on that category. So I moved it to "Opinions" and it was up for a few more minutes. I got a bunch of replies, and it was taken down again.

Then I tried going with "WiciLeeks"...same deal...then "Wiccileecz" and "Joolien Uhsonje". The posts were up a little longer, but then they were taken down, same message.

Then I posted under a guy who managed to put up a post called "WikiLeaks" but the whole article was basically bashing Obama, so in the reply column, I posted the my piece. There it stayed for about an hour, and I hit up the author and asked him, "how did you get your words to stay there?" That's when I noticed there were zero replies next his thread which had been there several days (all the other threads in the same catagory had replies in the double and triple digits)...in that hour, me and a couple other people put up replies, then it was completely yanked, and I got the "banned" message.

Oh well, another blog on censorship I guess. The Europeans will say 'told you so'...the Americans will keep watching Sports Center.

Why I Support WikiLeaks

My name is Jonathan, and I support WikiLeaks, because the greatest leaders in history would’ve done the same:

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”
-Buddha

“Speak the truth, and do not yield to anger…”
-Confucius

“They deem him their worst enemy, who tells them the truth.”
-Plato

“The least initial deviation from the truth is multiplied later a thousandfold.”
-Aristotle

“…ye shall know the Truth, and the truth shall set you free.”
-Jesus

“Say what is true, although it may be bitter and displeasing to people.”
-Muhammad

“There is no truth existing which I fear, or would wish unknown to the whole world.”
-Thomas Jefferson

“If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything.”
-Mark Twain

“Truth never damages a cause that is just.”
-Gandhi

“Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important ones.”
-Albert Eistein

“The truth is found when men are free to pursue it.”
-Franklin Delano Roosevelt

“The world is now too small for anything but 'the truth' and too terrible for anything but 'brotherhood.'”
-Adlai Stevenson

Truth is rock, lies and secrets are sand. When mankind builds upon rock, the structure stands strong, but when we attempt to build upon lies and secrets, it doesn’t take long before our building falls apart.

Historically, the US military has practiced “withholding” of truth based on the premise of “national security”. We are now finding out that in addition to withholding the truth, they are also lying about their actions as seen in leaked videos of Iraqi civilians being killed by US soldiers, recorded by our own surveillance, and leaked by concerned personnel who tried to go thru legal channels but were rebuffed several times over.

If US Military culture has shifted from withholding the truth to lying about their actions, the American people have a right to decide if that culture still suits our beliefs. We fund the military with our tax dollars, and they must be held accountable to us. We’re supposed to be the good guys!

Would we have found out the truth without WikiLeaks? I don’t know, but some questions to ask are, how long has this culture of lying pervaded the military, do they have a reason to stop and how long will the world tolerate distortion of the truth by the most effective killing machine on the planet?

I love America, or I would not seek to hold our leaders accountable. I believe in our military, or I would not attempt to correct what I believe to be a short-sighted, quick-fix to accomplishing their goals. WikiLeaks is a whistle blower operation that has become the most reliable source of truth, since our own media has been manipulated through monopoly takeovers that enable people of power to keep the truth hidden about their actual agendas.

Until our government, our military and our media become accountable, please join me and the millions of people whose eyes have been opened, in supporting WikiLeaks and Julian Assange to insure the truth can be no longer hidden, twisted or spun into that which is no longer truth. Otherwise we are living in the words of Adolf Hitler:
“The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”

Until next time, this is Jonathan Toth from Hoth signing off, and remember:

Transparency is the Apocalypse…and we’ll find out what that looks like…very soon

Latest collective theory on worldwide Animal deaths

[In three parts]

1. Wik-Bee Leaks Uncovers Government Bee Killing Conspiracy
http://animals.change.org/blog/view/wikileaks_uncovers_government_bee_killing_conspiracy

The November 2nd memo, leaked to a Colorado beekeeper, indicates that the EPA was well-aware that the pesticide Clothianidin posed some serious risks to honey bees. There have been concerns about this chemical from as far back as 2003, and it's already been banned in Germany, France, Italy and Slovenia because of its toxicity. But the EPA chose to sweep all that under the rug to keep the pesticide on the market.

Clothianidin, marketed as "Poncho" by Bayer, is widely used on corn, as well as canola, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers and wheat. As if the $262 million cash crop from last year wasn't enough, Bayer wants to keep expanding the pesticide's use. And the company's original registration was based on some seriously flawed science: they evaluated the wrong crop, with the wrong controls to assess the impact on bees.

This all adds up to some serious questions about the government contributing to Colony Collapse Disorder as they knowingly allowed Bayer to poison bees. And this is about a lot more than honey production ... native habitats, and as much as one-third of America's food supply, rely on the pollination provided by bees.

In light of the leaked memo, the National Honey Bee Advisory Board, American Beekeeping Federation, American Honey Producers Association, Beyond Pesticides, Pesticide Action Network North America, and Center for Biological Diversity sent a letter to the EPA requesting that the agency "take urgent action to stop the use of this toxic chemical."

The letter goes on to point out that this new information indicates an overuse of the Office of Pesticide Program's conditional registration program. This bee boondoggle "represents a failure that could and should have been avoided." As a result, the coalition is calling for an immediate moratorium on these types of registration until the program is evaluated.

There's still a lot we don't know about Colony Collapse Disorder and the massive bee die-offs it's been causing. One thing we do know is that bees are in trouble, and that's not good news for all the animals (and humans) who rely on the plants these important insects sustain.

Join the call for the EPA to stop the sale of Poncho and conduct a thorough study into the pesticide's impact on wildlife.




2. Bye Bye Blackbird: USDA Admits Responsibility for Mass Bird Death; 4,000,000 Birds Killed in ’09
http://morallowground.com/2011/01/20/bye-bye-blackbird-usda-admits-responsibility-for-mass-bird-death-4000000-birds-killed-in-09/

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) had admitted responsibility for the poisoning of thousands of birds, many of which were found dead on the ground and frozen in trees in Yankton, South Dakota on Monday. According to Truthout, the USDA’s Wildlife Services Program works with farmers to cull birds which often eat large quantities of agricultural feed and defecate on livestock and farm equipment. There’s even a name for this little-known government bird control program: Bye Bye Blackbird. In 2009 alone, the USDA killed more than 4,000,000 red-winged blackbirds, starlings, cowbirds and grackles. Pesticides are the weapon of choice; an avian poison called DRC-1339 was used in the Yankton case. Up to 5,000 birds were sprayed in neighboring Nebraska and somehow managed to make it to South Dakota before dying. The USDA stresses that this incident is in no way related to the mass bird deaths that have made headlines this year, most notably in Arkansas and Louisiana.

Under the Bye Bye Blackbird program, farmers are allowed to kill any blackbirds, grackles and starlings deemed to be a health risk or damaging to the economy. Farmers often hire private contractors to do the dirty work. “Every winter, there’s massive and purposeful kills of these blackbirds,” Greg Butcher, director of bird conservation at the National Audubon Society told Truthout. Carol Bannerman, a spokeswoman for USDA Wildlife Services, dismisses the obvious animal cruelty implications of such killings. “It’s not that we have anything against starlings, but our charge is to help protect agriculture… and protect property and human health or safety,” she said. “And the fact is, in a lot of rural settings, people say, ‘It’s just birds, what’s the problem?’”

It’s “just birds”… including some endangered ones. Ornithologists believe the mass killings may be reducing the number of the rare rusty blackbird, which roosts with more common varieties of blackbirds. With private contract killers not required to keep tabs of how many birds they kill, the rusty blackbird could be in serious danger.



3. Dead Birds, Bees & Fish Explained By EPA Document? VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CeR8tV1iss

This video is the Young Turks breaking down the simple logic of, "Hello?" If you kill the honey bees with poison (albeit unintentionally), then you admit to feeding the birds poison (after the US government stated on record, that they did not poison the birds) you don't think there could be exponential effects on the rest of our ecosystem?

Any poison infected bird that dies and falls into streams, rivers and oceans will be eaten by fish (sound familiar?) and any birds that fall on land around carnivores can be possibly eaten as well. Also, poisonous bird droppings will land all over crops, grains, and food for us and other animals.

It obviously wasn't well thought out, but GOD DAMN. Einstein said, "If the bees die, the human race will be dead within four years," (no pollinators, no plants) and now we're finding out the only other pollinators are dying as well. It doesn't sound very bright. It sounds like greed and opportunism, similar to what we've been experiencing with many big business decisions as of late.



Thanks to all my fellow WikiLeakers for collecting these links and sharing them freely.



Transparency is the Apocalypse...literally...now what shall we do about it?