Open Letter the US Government
February 3, 2011
People of the US Government,
It has come to our attention that some of you (not all) have been cheating, lying, stealing and/or murdering other human beings for reasons such as power, money, security and/or fear.
We here at WikiLeaks dare those of you who have witnessed such acts (or have proof) to come forward and submit your testimony and/or evidence to us, so that we may keep a steady check on the people in power who should be held accountable for the state of our government.
We will publish the material online, around the world, so that we Earthlings may be transparent about our governments, learn who are committing these acts and take necessary actions to correct the wrong or unacceptable. Then there will be less room for corruption amongst our governing bodies, and more room for actual idea building that helps unite the Earth.
Today, the world is thirsting for honorable people, as so many in power are proving to be less than desirable. For your actions, you may be considered a traitor by others for a time, but remember, they will only believe that until there are more of you than them. Once you are the majority, the rest will either fall in line with transparency or face the consequences of lying and hiding the truth.
Thank you much for being the best human being you know how to be,
the security of our planet depends upon you,
WikiLeakers
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
"The Pentagon Papers" Supreme Court ruling applies to WikiLeaks
I'm reading "Obama's War" by Bob Woodward ©2010, and on page 179 he says:
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
"On June 30, 1971, Supreme Court decision on the Pentagon Papers case, nearly four decades earlier and just three months before I joined the Post, opened the door for such conversations with the government. In its 6 to3 ruling, the court essentially said THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT RESTRAIN THE PRESS BEFORE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, which permitted The New York Times and The Washington Post to CONTINUE PUBLISHING the top secret 47-volume Vietnam War study, which showed that the government had repeatedly lied to the public about the war.
Because the government COULD NOT LEGALLY STOP US FROM PUBLISHING the McChrystal assessment, we had the upper hand in listening to arguments for deleting passages from the report. For the Pentagon Papers, the Times and Post did not consult the government in advance. To do so would have alerted the government and likely resulted in a court action to stop publication, which is exactly what the government did in federal court after the initial articles ran.
The beauty of the Supreme Court's Pentagon Paper ruling--WHICH FORBIDS RESTRAINT--is that IT ENCOURAGES US TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO THE PUBLICATION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS."
[my CAPS...but interesting timing on Woodward's part to bring this up now]
Since this IS the case, the US government CANNOT seek any kind of "espionage" charge against Julian Assange. They know this.
My questions are:
-If our government would take this again to the supreme court, do they have enough pull to change the ruling or alter it to depict WikiLeaks as something other than "The Press"?
-Do any of these political assassinations that happened in the last two weeks have anything to do with WikiLeaks?
1. John Wheeler III-bio/chemical warfare expert for both Bush's, found in land fill after the birds and the fish started dying (1/4/2011)
2. John Roll-federal judge placed in office by Bush Sr. in 1991, who in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit in Arizona, killed by Jared Loughner (1/8/2011)
3. Ashley Turton (married to Daniel A. Turton, 43, the White House's deputy director of legislative affairs for the House of Representatives)-lobbyist for Progress Energy, that Duke Energy bought for $13 billion in stock the day after her death, found in her burned car, in her garage (1/10/2011)
-Now that these people are dead, what new options does the government have in regards to WikiLeaks (meaning: did any of them have any damaging info or power that some in the government might have felt was a threat)?
-Were these assassinations simple vendettas performed by the CIA to intimidate anyone who might think of snitching to WikiLeaks?
Just questions...but transparency will sort it all out...
Transparency is the Apocalypse.
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Something big and bad is about to happen...it's in the wind.
BBC NEWS
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
24 December 2010
US pilot 'probed over YouTube videos of airport lapses'
The videos on YouTube allegedly showed ground crew members swiping security cards and then entering the airport's secure areas without any screening.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12078040://
I smell a set up. Remember history:
Before JFK died there were lots of messages and signs that most missed. Jim Garrison does a great job of pulling up the evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vdsEN4rC5M
Lately it's been things like: "Military is now playing 'War Games' scenarios of how to handle public outcry and rioting"...and CIA engaging in "Operation WTF (WikiLeaks Taskforce) to "examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations"...or US Senators saying on the record, "you illegally shoot the son-of-a-bitch (Julian Assange)"...
I'm just saying...
Now we have a pilot who noticed something was fishy about the airline worker checkpoint, so he taped it and put it up somewhere public, BECAUSE HE KNEW IT WOULD GARNER SOME ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY...
that's a call for help...
JFK died as a result of the Military Industrial Complex losing power to a young, upstart president who thought he could "break the CIA into a million pieces," even though the military had been grooming the CIA since WWII.
US President Dwight D. Eisenhower said this in his exit speech on Jan.17,1961:
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence...the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty my prosper together."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
Please be aware at all times for game playing on the part of the Military Industrial Complex. Remember there were "War Games" going on the week before 9-11, that's why they claim fighters weren't scrambled the moment those four airlines went off course (national security protocol has fighters ready for attack within 20 minutes of any major commercial airline course derivision) and took two hours to hit the World Trade towers.
The CIA took out JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and most likely Malcolm X. Those leaders' messages of change was too much for the leaders of our military to handle, so they were silenced.
Let's not let that happen again. Notice. Pray...and next time they are tempted, let's catch them in the act and let everyone know about it. Then maybe we can peacefully coexist with our military brothers who might be afraid of peaceful change.
Transparency is the Apocalypse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
