Friday, February 8, 2013

The Curious Case of Chris Dorner



A Los Angeles Police Department cop and former military man, Chris Dorner was fired after blowing the whistle on questionable activity by his fellow officers over a period of four years. This week, it is alleged that he shot three people and took off on the run while documenting it in a long-winded "manifesto" explaining his actions, his history and his beliefs. The LAPD has already shot up three cars and injured several civilians during the start of a frantic man hunt. Mainstream media has not picked up the story yet...the internet is buzzing.

In regards to Dorner, I'm still waiting to find out:

1. Is this guy really psycho? (doubt it)
2. Is he a whistle blower on the run being framed for LAPD corruption? (most likely)
3. Is this just military-style Psy-Ops "theater" waged to control public opinion about gun control? (possibly, the CIA can be quite opportunist)
4. Is it all of the above? (from what we've learned about US history, patsies come in all shapes and sizes - Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan - but they usually aren't completely innocent).

To be specific: I don't know for sure what's transpired. Was his manifest edited? Probably. The media took out the juicy names, what else did they censor/invent? Did he actually kill anyone? I hope not. How many movies have we seen where the boyscout gets framed for his superiors' unethical behavior? MANY.

What I do know: there is a significant percentage of power mongers that, when called out, they shift the blame and defame the accuser so the public thinks they are lying...it happens all the time. The US government and the military industrial complex use that tactic on the regular, and the Los Angeles Police Department is FAMOUS for being corrupt.




I hope we find out the truth...if it is as the media reports, so be it, but if this is theater...I'm veeeeeeery interested in finding out who authorized this.




["Full" Manifesto via NBC]

2 comments:

  1. Why would he have waited five years to take revenge? Why target the daughter of the captain who defended him as opposed to the officer who beat the shit out of the homeless man, or members of the police board who sided with her and fired him? What about the judge who upheld their decision? Why on earth would he go after his advocate's daughter?

    Where is the video footage from the complex where he murdered his first victims and why haven't we heard more about it after a resident mentioned it to the L.A. Times? Why would he burn the truck when that would have given away his location? Why are the only evidences against him a mysterious "wallet" that police claim to have found three different times in three separate places (including, amazingly enough, the burnt-down cabin), and a typed (thus unverifiable by handwriting analysis) manifesto posted on Facebook?

    Why should we take something that was posted on his Facebook profile seriously when any hacker could have planted it and the military-intelligence community has teams of professionals in that field at their fingertips? Why would Facebook refuse to 'play ball' in such a set-up when they received their initial funding from a CIA proprietary and when they collaborate in the intelligence community's data mining, all while receiving $429 million in tax refunds from the government (while not being taxed at all on their $1.1 billion in 2012 profits)?

    Why did the police request the media to halt their coverage shortly before torching the cabin? Why did independent journalists who continued reporting state that the police clearly set fire to the cabin on purpose, a claim confirmed by the audio and video from the scene? Why was the suspect "pushed back in" to the cabin after he attempted to escape through the back (or surrender)? Why, with all of this, did they claim that they did not deliberately burn down the cabin, even as they had told fire/emergency personnel to stand down until the cabin was torched?

    Why did the police first claim that they had found no body in the cabin? Why did they then claim that the body may not have been Dorner, before finally saying that he died of a "self-inflicted gunshot wound," a story that is in complete contradiction to everything they have previously reported?

    Was Dorner in Navy Intelligence, since it has been reported he received naval intelligence training? Why did he stay at a massive naval base two days after committing the murders? How did he evade the police when he was allegedly "hiding out" across the street from the sheriff's command post?

    This has all the appearances of a psychological warfare operation, and the latest in a series of them across the United States.

    Scott Creighton has been following this story closely, and I recommend his articles:
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/category/christopher-dorner/

    He's been doing an awesome job exposing the oddities in a lot of these "mass shootings" - from Aurora to Sandy Hook.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for more info. I'm using this as a part of my next chapter for the book I've been writing about Obama/CIA/Wikileaks and one of the wildest administrations we've had in the USA: "Transparency is the Apocalypse"

    ReplyDelete