What Modern Day "Conspiracy Theory" Means: We Don't Believe You

When people use the term "conspiracy theory" or "conspiracy theorist" as a means of discrediting others, it's a bit awkward. The person labeling is short-sighted, because in the long run of history, many conspiracy theories turn out to be true.

Early on, it was J.E.Hoover (head of the FBI) who declared "there is no mafia." He spoke in the name of the US government, and it turned out it was a lie. Regardless of whether his lie was a strategic feint to further ensnare more mafioso, it was still a lie. MK-ULTRA (CIA sponsored mind control experiments), The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (injecting African Americans with disease and monitoring them) and Operation Mockingbird (government controlled media) were all wildly outlandish propositions during their introduction into our society, and anyone attempting to acknowledge them would be laughed at (even called crazy), but nevertheless, they turned out to be true. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was reported by our government as an attack on a US ship by the North Vietnamese. At the time, anyone who doubted it would be considered a "conspiracy theorist" even though they would've been right (it was propaganda). During he Iran-Contra scandal, our government lied, and Ollie North went to jail. It's been proven the government has lied then and many other times. Why is that so difficult to conceive of presently?

Did the government just decide to stop lying now?

Here's part of the problem: when our government lies about what it tells the public, that divides the public into those who believe the lie and those who believe it's a conspiracy. That means, EVERY TIME the government lies they create conspiracy theorists. Why can't our government just be honest like the way we expect them (and pay them) to be?

President Nixon is actually given credit for coining the phrase "conspiracy theorist," because of all the US citizens calling him out on his lies. Is that irony or satire (or just an attempt to defame/discredit those who know the truth)?

Overall, "conspiracy theorists" often prove they were right. There was a conspiracy to lie/withhold/interfere/confuse the public.

Now, why would they do that? A better question may be, is that who you want running this country?

Letter to the Editor of Newsmax.com - Concerning JFK, James Files and Charles Nicoletti

Letter to the editor:
one of your stories was misquoted...curiously so.



In the Newmax TV special on "I killed JFK" (aired 11/20/2014 on Directv channel 349 and Dish channel 223)
James Files said
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the Dal-Tex building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."

Newsmax.com quoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the building that was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(you left out Dal-Tex)
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/john-kennedy-assassination-confession-mafia/2014/11/20/id/608736/

Inquisitr quoted him (11/20/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored you)
THEN
"According to Files, it was Nicoletti who was supposed to be in the book depository and not Oswald."
THEY LIED.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1625226/mob-hitman-james-files-confesses-to-jfk-assassination-again-claims-he-was-man-on-grassy-knoll/

DailyMail quoted him (11/21/2014):
"I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy but I know he was the man in the building who was supposed to be doing the shooting."
(they mirrored you too)
THEN
"He says the other shot that hit Pres. Kennedy came from his boss, Charles 'Chuckie' Nicoletti, who was hiding out in the book depository, the same place Lee Harvey Oswald is believed to have been at the time of the shooting.
THEY LIED TOO.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2843665/Mob-hitman-James-Files-claims-man-responsible-President-John-F-Kennedy-s-assassination-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-never-fired-single-shot.html



You withheld "Dal-Tex" in your reporting of his direct quote.
Inquisitr and DailyMail changed Dal-Tex to "the book depository."

My concern is: this isn't about the past or conspiracy theories, this is about a testimony on camera. Within that recorded testimony, you withheld "Dal-Tex" intentionally, even though it's ON CAMERA. Then these other publications intentionally misled readers into believing Nicoletti shot at Kennedy from the book depository, instead of the Dal-Tex building, even though it's ON CAMERA.

Why did you remove "Dal-Tex" (what he actually said) from the quote?
Why did they change Dal-Tex to the book depository?
Who ordered the withholding of Dal-Tex?
Who ordered the lie?



If you are to be considered a serious news source, it would behoove you to find out who is attempting to confuse the public. It's been happening with this case for sometime now.



thanks,
Jonathan



Excerpts from "Files on JFK" used by Newsmax TV in "I Killed JFK"
Copyright Wim Dankbaar of http://jfkmurdersolved.com/

The Caveman is Still Here

All of the societal conflicts we are dealing with come down to evolution. We haven't weeded out the caveman yet.

Anytime a human being hurts another intentionally, they're living in the past. They haven't given up a culture of behavior they were raised with and still consider it acceptable, especially if they can get away with it.

Our government has elements of the caveman within it, our military is mostly driven by the caveman mentality "kill or be killed," and some of our police have taken up this same position.
Capitalism has been redefined as amoral, which is what a caveman is.
Even between men and women, the abuse we inflict on each other comes from fear, which is TOTAL CAVEMAN.



How do we evolve together?
(the faster, the better)

Selling Fear is Big Business

FEAR:
False Evidence Appearing Real
(and still the easiest way to control the masses)

STEREOTYPES:
White people are afraid of black people. Black people are afraid of police. Women are afraid of men. Men are afraid of being controlled by women. Americans are afraid of being terrorized. The rest of the world is afraid of being taken over by the USA. Everyone is scared of something...

However you look at it, FEAR is only real if you believe it. The problem is, some people know how to profit from this instinct that we've been evolving away from. It's an easy adrenaline rush, (like watching a horror flick) except TV producers and media moguls have figured out how to incorporate it in every moment of our waking existence.

Do we want that?
How do we see the truth?
What is a WIN-WIN solution for everyone?

Hand Up, Don't Shoot

It's awkward to see most of the media get it wrong. "Hands Up Don't Shoot" is not about white vs. black. It's a response to people in power (police or otherwise) being able to kill the rest of us with no punishment.

When you, as a civilian, realize there is a certain percentage of Americans who can kill you with impunity...that's like culture shock.

What if they get it wrong?
(check the statistics on capital punishment,
how many innocent people die?)

‪#‎HandUpDontShoot‬
for real man, like put the gun down and let's talk
‪#‎AllOrNothing‬
it's not fair for you to have that kind of right, if I do not

#ProsecuteTheProsecutor

Conspiracy to Mislead the Public: Michael Brown and Darren Wilson Photos Have Been Altered

***BREAKING***

WE WILL BE UPDATING THIS STORY IN REAL TIME...



Several whistleblowers have come forward to expose massive collusion between Police, TV media and the Federal government. They have proof that all photos and video alleging to contain footage of Michael Brown and Darren Wilson were not of Brown or Wilson. They were actors paid to simulate the killing of Brown. The government and police believed there would be massive unrest if their identities were made public. Local and state Police working with the Federal government were also aided and abetted by FOX, CBS, NBC and ABC. They all agreed to air segments and photos of what they considered "safe" for public consumption, to keep any unrest from occurring.

Here for the first time, are their true identities:


Michael Brown, age 18
June 2014, Ladue, MO


Darren Wilson, age 28
May 2013, Olivette, MO




These and other photos (and video) were withheld from public view, as to keep the populace from committing crimes of violence. "Herd mentality" was cited as dangerous enough to justify "recreations" of the persons involved. Michael Brown actually lived in Ladue and was shot and killed at the McDonald's at Olive and Dielman road. Seven eyewitnesses went on record that Wilson was the aggressor, and six eyewitnesses claimed Brown attacked Wilson, but those eyewitnesses withheld their names from the public.



Michael Brown with friends, after high school graduation,
May 2014, Ladue, MO




We will continue to update this story. Once again, several whistleblowers have come forward to expose massive collusion between Police, TV media and the Federal government to confuse the public about the identities of Brown and Wilson.

Will public opinion change now that it turns out Michael Brown was a white teenager from Ladue and Darren Wilson is an African-American policeman on paid-leave from Olivette?